"Nice flavor. Terrible burn and construction."
I didn t expect much at this price point. However, you expect to ACTUALLY be able to smoke the cigar. On a 10 point scale i d give the draw a solid 6 but the burn and construction would be a 1. I attempted to smoke 10 of them, with only two being smokeable . Threw the other 10 away. My advice? Stay away.
Nathan Welchin Anacoco LA
May 19, 2019
|
"No Supervisors"
Clearly this smoke needed a supervisor on location. Just calling it a supervisor collection does not improve the soft rolled namby-pamby, casper-milque-toast, non-full flavored nature of these bad impression giving sticks. Someone may like what they are, but not those who read the description. Does not match the product at all. Wish I could send them back. Not even worthy of a lawn mowing cigar.
jonin ne
April 30, 2019
|
"Terrible"
Dont waste your money. Really bad burn. Taste.
Rin Weinberg
April 30, 2019
|
"Good smoke"
Good cigar. Good draw and burn. A little soft but good value for the price. I would say medium bodied rather than full.
Stanin Jackson, MS
April 17, 2019
|
"ICKY"
worst burning cigar I have ever smoked
Jeffin Montana
August 22, 2018
|
"Do not waste your money"
Ordered a bundle and have smoked seven of them so far. 6 of the 7 had a horrible draw. Thinking of throwing them out. A waste of money
Bill in AZ
October 31, 2013
|
"Great cigar"
I bought a pack of these a while ago, the size is comparable to a Monte Cristo no2, the burn and draw are excellent which equates to a good construction. The cigar lasts a good 2/3 hours and is enjoyable until the last inch where it becomes a little bitter. Overall I am very happy with this cigar and I would order this again
Sadate in London UK
October 7, 2013
|
Your Privacy Choices