Showing 1 through 10 of 11 reviews
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Churchill
"Yep I was Right"
Just a follow up I have finished the entire bundle and I would give these cigars a solid 7 I had no construction issues or bad sticks in the bunch I will continue to smoke these because they are really quite good. a great daily smoke try them.
Ken Christensen in Sammamish Washington
January 11, 2011
|
Royal Nicaraguan Sumatra Toro
"Very Nice"
Quite surprised at the the draw burn and constuction.
Anonymousin Commerce City, Colo.
November 27, 2010
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Churchill
"A Fantastic Smoke"
Wow after reading the reviews I had to buy a box because I did not believe they could be that bad. and I was right. They are a very nice well constructed looking cigar, excellent burn and draw, tons of smoke and a solid woody flavor with light pepper building toward the finish, the ash was long and tight, and the overall value exceeded what I expected. I have only smoked a few so far but the flavor and draw are excellent especially if you prefer mild woody smokes and the churchill length really made this a deal. I personaly did not see or taste what the other guys smoked but it could not have been this cigar its a winner. give them a try.
Ken in Sammamish Washington
August 11, 2010
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Belicoso
"Turible."
I bought a bundle of these hoping for the best. They look fantastic. Unfortunately it's all downhill from there. I'll never purchase again. Turible.
Anonymous
August 4, 2010
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Churchill
dewdew
September 2, 2009
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Robusto
"Good taste, poor construction"
I have bought six bundles from Famous Smoke over the last year. Most have been good. Have bought the Famous Smoke 2000 robusto, Rocky Patel sampler, etc. The last was thr Royal Nicaraguan. The burn is poor; too hot, draw too quick, taste is good but the construction is poor. The cigar burns and draws like a loosley rolled newspaper.
Bruce in Madera, California
May 19, 2009
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Robusto
"Good taste, poor construction"
I have bought six bundles from Famous Smoke over the last year. Most have been good. Have bought the Famous Smoke 2000 robusto, Rocky Patel sampler, etc. The last was thr Royal Nicaraguan. The burn is poor; too hot, draw too quick, taste is good but the construction is poor. The cigar burns and draws like a loosley rolled newspaper.
Bruce in Madera, California
May 19, 2009
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Robusto
"Rolled like a loose newspaper"
The cigar is priced right. Taste is good, but burn is inconsistent. Great cigar if construction was better.
Bruce in Madera, California
May 18, 2009
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Churchill
"Unbelievably Bad"
The taste is bitter and the draw is horrendous! I had to use my Dirt Devil to suck hard enough on the cigar to get a burn on it! Ouch! Buy a broomstick handle and cut it into churhill's, it would actually taste better!
Morgan in Western Kansas
March 30, 2009
|
Royal Nic Sumatra Belicoso
"So So"
I bought this cigar with hopes of finding a diamond in the rough? unfortunately the one I smoked didn't do much for me the flavor wasn't there it was harsh and the taste was a bit acrid to be fair this may have been due in part to smoking it right after delivery (which can be a hasty thing to do with some cigars) I will leave them in the humidor for six months before I smoke another and hopefully time will improve them.
Dave in Arizona
January 23, 2009
|
Your Privacy Choices